Media Transparency — Scorecard
Five short questions about how clearly your marketing records tell the story.
No login, no payment. Pick the answer that best matches each row: spend visibility, what each source can prove, comparisons, disclosure, and review timing. The score appears on the page and stays within the same informational-review boundary as the rest of Media Transparency — no authenticity or fraud call.
Informational evidence review—not a definitive authenticity, fraud, legal, or identity determination. The five answer levels use the same format as the dashboard and sample report; your answers go through the existing contact intake used by the sample-report form.
Self-assess, then point us at the next read
Check your records, then choose the next step.
The scorecard below is a quick self-check. The five answer levels match the example dashboard and sample report. We save the score and your email so the operator can reply with the closest review; if the paid AI Opportunity Audit fits, the success screen takes you there.
Read the dashboard
Transparent Media Dashboard
Headline numbers, spend breakdown, the path from inquiry to revenue, campaign detail, process performance, changes, recommendations, and source labels.
Walkthrough
Sample report
Six sections of plain prose showing what a working Media Transparency snapshot contains — using the same example data shape and disclosure wording.
Parent surface
Media Transparency
The overview of what this service reviews and what it does not decide, with the full scope matrix and FAQ.
Self-score — five bins, one read.
Five answer levels — using the same clear source labels as the examples.
Pick the answer that best matches each row of your record. The scorecard computes a live category percentage and overall score, then sends both through the same contact path the sample-report form uses.
Methodology
How the score is computed.
Five categories, each scored from 0 to 5 (Silent → Fully covered). The overall score is the average of the five category percentages, with every category carrying the same weight. This is a self-assessment, not a third-party ruling or leaderboard.
spend_visibility
Spend by channel
Every spend row names the channel behind it — no anonymous line items.
attribution_clarity
What each source can prove
Each row says whether the value is directly recorded, modeled, estimated, or unavailable instead of hiding that detail in a total.
benchmarking
Starting points and comparison results
Each headline number has a comparison and a starting point — no number without the records behind it.
disclosure
Source labels on every row
Every row carries a source label; silent rows stay silent instead of being quietly called estimates.
optimization_cadence
Process status and timing
Every process has a status, run count, and typical response time — no black box with no signal.
Next step
From $497. Evidence-based read. No fraud or authenticity call.
Informational evidence review—not a definitive authenticity, fraud, legal, or identity determination. The request is forwarded in writing, escalated if appropriate, and answered on the informational-review framing here.